CivArchive
    Lumiere Alpha from Aixonlab - Alpha
    Preview 41188198
    Preview 41204457
    Preview 41204454
    Preview 41238824
    Preview 41237370
    Preview 41237073
    Preview 41237248
    Preview 41237506
    Preview 41237072
    Preview 41237464
    Preview 41237709
    Preview 41238337
    Preview 41239219

    Note: This model was originally posted here, and is created by Aixonlab.


    Note: While the results are exceptional, potentially better than base Flux.1 Dev, beware that combining with existing Flux LoRAs does not produce fantastic results! - Ally

    Lumiere Alpha

    We are excited to announce Lumiere Alpha, A model focusing on improving realism without compromising prompt coherency or changing the composition completely from the original Flux.1-Dev model.

    Text-to-Image

    For the best results, we strongly recommend using a guidance scale of 3.0 and setting steps between 28 and 35, with Euler Beta.

    Attribution notice

    The FLUX.1 [dev] Model is licensed by Black Forest Labs. Inc. under the FLUX.1 [dev] Non-Commercial License. Copyright Black Forest Labs. Inc.

    Our model is released under the FLUX.1 [dev] Non-Commercial License.

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (17)

    colinw2292823Nov 20, 2024· 10 reactions
    CivitAI

    Hey cool model thanks!

    I appreciate the side by side too from dev vs this. People really should do that more often. 10/10!

    AlphaTester01Nov 21, 2024· 6 reactions
    CivitAI

    I think this checkpoint don't work very well with loras, some cases is good, sometimes really bad. I don't know, maybe I'm missing something.

    theally
    Author
    Nov 21, 2024· 3 reactions

    Correct, it does not work well with existing Flux LoRAs

    CarcamagnuNov 21, 2024· 3 reactions

    I too encountered the same problem with LoRAs! ... I had generation of noise and loss of sharpness; sometimes can be also a bit "artistic" (have a look to my images posted here, in a couple of them it is quite eveident), but in general it is an issue. Tried to increase steps but not too many results even if a bit better ... :(

    CarcamagnuNov 21, 2024· 8 reactions
    CivitAI

    Excellent resource! ... quite a little different from FLUX ... people are more "real" and less glamorous and this is better! ... experiments with LoRAs give mixed results ... sometimes they give the desired effect, sometimes they generate a unavoidable noise in the image. It deserves more experimentations! (if someone else had results on this aspect, please share your opinion)

    Definitely faster... I'll use it for sure! :D ... thanks to the Axionlab and theally who distributed it here.

    NarzNov 23, 2024· 2 reactions

    when you get that artifact noise (or flux-grid), try bringing the shift value down, it can cook an image sometimes too. ymmv (sigh)

    fox23vang226Nov 21, 2024· 13 reactions
    CivitAI

    Still seeing cleft chins...sigh...

    EricRollei21Nov 24, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    seems like a creative model and I like the style but often even with the recommended euler+beta 30 steps, it's still very soft and grainy. What do people recommend for tighter more detailed images?

    Norge2003Nov 25, 2024

    I have the same troubles. I'm using the model in Forge with the recommended settings, but all the outputs have a very grainy appearance. Does anyone have any idea what could be causing the problem?

    3185264Nov 26, 2024· 2 reactions

    Ive have good luck with:
    - Sampler - DEIS
    - Scheduler - Simple

    I upscale it and results are sharp

    pychobj2001741Nov 26, 2024

    Euler Beta is a bit better then Simple, I also like this with the ClownShark node and the bogacki-shampine_7s Sampler w/ a beta57 scheduler, it's very slow but w/ the 8 step turbo lora it's not that bad and very very great results (with any model really but this one more so since it's going for fine details to begin with.)

    condzero1950Feb 17, 2025

    I'm using dpm++2m with karras. Yes, I notice a slight bit more noise, nothing too bad which I believe is helping to give it a more realistic look.

    goldmanDec 4, 2024· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    I really like the result this model gives until as you say you introduce Lora's into the workflow...it doesn't play nice with them at all..needs to be addressed if possible to make this the best model it can be..huge upside if it can be rectified..

    BugimenDec 22, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    how does it work with art, vector, and other techniques? Thank you in advance

    condzero1950Feb 19, 2025
    CivitAI

    Your model isn't fp16, but fp8 based on size.

    I wanted to dispel the notion that your model can't be mixed. I did the following:

    50/50 merge with Lumiere Alpha from Aixonlab and ultrarealFineTuneV4 (Flux 1D)

    plus the following (2) loras and strengths:

    <lora:aidmaFLUXPro1.1-FLUX-v0.3:0.8>aidmafluxpro1.1

    <lora:flux_vividizer:0.8>

    You can visualize some of my results in the images below. I have referenced those with this new hybrid model.

    juansanchezd609Apr 22, 2025

    How did you merge the models?

    showbert7Jul 8, 2025
    CivitAI

    Excuse me can you please release the fp16 version and gguf?

    Checkpoint
    Flux.1 D

    Details

    Downloads
    1,565
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    11/20/2024
    Updated
    5/24/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Available On (1 platform)

    Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.