CivArchive
    Preview 67126006
    Preview 67126150
    Preview 67125893
    Preview 67126132
    Preview 67126133
    Preview 67126134
    Preview 67126135
    Preview 67126136
    Preview 67126138
    Preview 67126161
    Preview 67126160
    Preview 67126165
    Preview 67126189
    Preview 67126193
    Preview 67126195
    Preview 67126194
    Preview 67126201
    Preview 67126198
    Preview 67126203
    Preview 67126204

    A nude/NSFW capable model that focuses on images with a female primary subject.

    It is heavily biased towards nude images.

    Sampler is dpmpp_2m (DPM++ 2M) and the scheduler is beta

    No VAE or CLIP is baked in. Use separate sources for those.

    Each sample/preview image contains the used workflow. Here's a quick article with simpler more beginner-friendly workflow. This is a recommended starting point.

    FP8 Download

    For some reason, when you upload multiple formats (BF16 + FP8) on one model, which they now support, they hide the FP8 under the BF16 model group in the side menu...

    Early Access is enabled to support the development of new versions and models.

    Description

    v3: Improved bodies. Improved vaginas. Works good with LoRAs. Better steerability and control. Worse nipples, need to fix them up again in a new version.

    FAQ

    Comments (6)

    AishaAIApr 1, 2025· 10 reactions
    CivitAI

    I'm waiting for the day when Flux's NSFW models will be able to generate a hand with 5 fingers 🥺

    AfgmcApr 1, 2025· 3 reactions

    Forget fingers, I'd be satisfied if the girls just had two arms and two legs when I'm trying to get them in anything other than the simplest poses!

    (No disrespect is intended to the valiant souls who try to make NSFW Flux versions and distribute them here at no cost. Although the underlying model has a lot of things going for it, Flux seems just as weak as SD3 sometimes.)

    AishaAIApr 1, 2025· 1 reaction

    @Afgmc I had always wondered why SDXL models created deformed fingers in 6 out of 10 generated images, and I thought for a long time that the problem was something with the architecture, or because SDXL was already outdated, but from what I understand, whenever someone does training the quality is lost.

    AishaAIApr 1, 2025· 1 reaction

    @Afgmc Using Flux DEV/Schnell, I don't remember it ever generating a deformed hand, even in weird contexts. So I decided to try out several NSFW models of Flux, and I saw that it was just as bad at making fingers as SDXL. Not only that, basic Flux commands like writing on a poster also didn't work anymore. So from what became obvious in this experiment, Flux and SDXL are not far apart in architecture, but in training quality.

    I understand that people have limited resources to do good training (when compared to Black Forest Labs), and some do it without getting anything in return (SOME), but there comes a time when it's not enough to be a cute dog playing the piano, you need to play well.

    AfgmcApr 1, 2025

    @AishaAI I noticed the text-mangling too - if the anatomy gets messed up then it's quite likely the text will be as well. As for the base Flux models, I've never tried them as I generally create NSFW stuff.

    6tZ
    Author
    Apr 1, 2025· 1 reaction

    Yeah there's something challenging about training with Flux, it will destroy any known anatomy, like fingers and hands, and create sausages or other body horror, as soon as you start training something that isn't perfectly captioned to the way it wants bodies to be captioned. I believe.

    Checkpoint
    Flux.1 D
    by 6tZ

    Details

    Downloads
    1,929
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    3/31/2025
    Updated
    6/14/2026
    Deleted
    -