When you're a cis or bi guy, they say you're either a 'boob man', or a 'butt man', or a 'leg man'. Me ? I'm definitely the latter !!! I don't mind a nice rack nor a shapely derriere, and as a sometime-glamor-photographer I've shot plenty of all three.

But show me a set of long, toned legs in a pair of sexy (overpriced) heels, and my heart rate starts going up, my mouth starts going dry, and I find it very hard to focus on anything else.

SD is pretty good at giving me my fix of good gams 'out of the box' ... but if you're anything like me, you're probably thinking "yeah, but it could still be better".

So ... here's my first attempt to address the 'issue'. It's my first working Lora, trained on a set of 244 images of sexy legs, shapely feet, seductive heels, and some appropriate lingerie thrown in. I recommend using a strength of between 0.3-06, and I've found this will generally determine if your shot keeps the rest of your subjects body, or just focuses in on the legs.

"Legshow" is the magic woid, "heels" or "high heels" also encourage good results.

It's definitely not perfect (mixed results with toes, typically require multiple generations, I'm sure inpainting would fix 'em too but hey this is only Week 3 or maybe 4 for me using SD, so proper use of inpainting is waaaay above my skill-level RN haha). I'm sure I'll tweak it some more and update, but pretty happy with it for now ... so ... go nuts :P

Tested in a buncha models as with all my releases, and works. Hell ... even Pixar got the legshow treatment and it worked. Yeesh !