CivArchive
    No Panties? (Hidden Privates) - v1.0
    NSFW
    Preview 639320
    Preview 639326
    Preview 639337
    Preview 639343
    Preview 639347
    Preview 639348
    Preview 639350
    Preview 639353
    Preview 639369
    Preview 639356
    Preview 639358
    Preview 639417
    Preview 639365
    Preview 639386

    This is a Lora trained on images where a girl is probably or obviously not wearing panties, but pussy is not visible (such as haitenai? tag on pixiv). Most models, especially anime/booru models, can be too eager to go full nsfw when trying to generate suggestive images, and if you add "pussy juice" then it's pretty much impossible to not generate exposed pussy. This Lora will drastically improve consistency when generating those borderline suggestive prompts, and also contains training for various types of ways to display a lack of panties without exposing the crotch. See list of tags below for details.

    Main tags:

    npmaybe, probably no panties : used on images where the lack of panties is questionable, or at least not too obvious. "probably no panties" will be affected by "no panties", depending on the base model, while "npmaybe" is new so should have an equal, but lesser effect. You can use both, or either, test and see.

    npclearly, obviously no panties : used when there's no way girl's wearing underwear. The training didn't really grasp the difference very well, so most of time it won't make any difference which tag you use, but it does sometimes make a difference as shown in the previews.

    hidden privates : used on all images in the dataset. Very effective at hiding privates, as you could guess. I would recommend always using it.

    hidden crotch or partially visible crotch : one or the other used depending on if the crotch, specifically the area right next to where you would expect the pussy to be, is visible or not. Ex: raising skirt right at the edge so bottom of crotch is barely visible, or a front slit cutting off right next to pussy.

    hidden by leg/clothes/hair/tail/border/other : These help hiding the crotch, but the "by" part doesn't seem to do anything. Probably not enough training data for each. "convenient leg" was also added with hidden by leg.

    Other new tags :

    upthigh : when thigh is visible especially high, above groin. Usually on front view, skirt lift images.

    innerthigh : this one's ambiguous and I'm not sure it does much, but it's added on images where you can see the inner thigh right next to the crotch.

    sidethigh : when you can see the bare thigh from the side all the way up to the butt. Probably won't do much if the view isn't from the side, use "from side", or "side view" for more moderate effect.

    sitbare : when sitting down, usually on floor, with knees up, and you can see the bare bottom of butt. I haven't tested this much, I wouldn't expect a noticeable difference since default generation is like that already.

    backcrack : the opposite of groin I guess, lowleg from behind showing butt crack.

    underbutt : not a new tag, but putting it here since it's similar to above tags. underboob for butts.

    (slightly) lifting one side/both sides of skirt

    very lowleg

    Relevant existing booru tags :

    groin, skirt slit, side slit, front slit, skirt lift, lifted by self, wind lift, skirt tug, microskirt, bottomless, naked shirt/apron/tabard/etc, no bra, convenient censoring,

    hair censor (check out hair censor loras, very few images with hair censoring in this one so it probably won't work great on its own),

    see-through silhouette (lora for this will also help a lot, otherwise it usually becomes completely see-through, although it does always hide crotch)

    Notes

    If you'd like, you can check out example (partial) prompts on this wildcard I made to test the lora: https://files.catbox.moe/lb3l8g.txt

    The :TT after lora in previews is a preset for the Lora Block Weight extension. It reduces the lora's impact on the background, in particular. To reproduce, add this line in the presets:

    TT:1,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1,1,1,1,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (16)

    138759Apr 30, 2023
    CivitAI

    I realize this might not be what this is for, but can it do pubic hair peak?

    wewewew
    Author
    Apr 30, 2023

    No, I don't think the dataset has any pubic hair.

    lIIIllIIIlIApr 30, 2023· 9 reactions
    CivitAI

    I like this better.
    Full exposure reduces imagination.

    wewewew
    Author
    Apr 30, 2023· 5 reactions
    CivitAI

    Man, this automatic image rating and flagging is going to kill the site. 18+ filter is already stupid and arbitrary, but then a bunch of random images are "flagged for review" for no reason and completely hidden, and still hidden after 14 hours!

    Like, why the hell is this flagged?? https://files.catbox.moe/0oydxf.png

    Face look too young or what? It's literally every output by realistic models....

    I wouldn't be against an image rating and moderation if you could handle it, but you clearly can't.

    SD_AI_2025May 1, 2023· 4 reactions

    When you make a website where people post what they want, the best way to get in very serious trouble is to trust users.

    Images HAVE TO BE checked by a human eye, and prompts have to be read also by a human to be SURE that there is nothing against the law. And yes, this can take time. Nobody pays in here, Civitai doesn't have 100 employees to check what's posted in here every second.

    If you don't like that, create your own website and give people the freedom to post what they want. Sure why not ? Then sit back and enjoy your freedom, because it won't last long before you get a court summons to pay a hefty fine, or the cops knocking at your door.

    wewewew
    Author
    May 2, 2023· 2 reactions

    @hansolocambo As I said, I would have no issue if the automated system worked or didn't take a full day to get reviewed when it doesn't. The auto detection is complete nonsense, and if you can't review flagged posts as they come, that means they're ultimately coming faster than you can deal with them, so they'll pile up. What then?

    I'm well aware every site needs moderation. What I'm saying is this one's shit.

    JaysonPhoenixMay 9, 2023· 2 reactions

    nah wewewew is absolutely right, this s going out of hand by now and has become extremely annoying and creators leaving the site. auto flagging is bs either way because as you can see it fails miserably, pretty much every other site has manual reporting and moderation which would be good enough for the law, but even then... society as a whole is running crazy, i wouldnt dare to post a single pic containing women anywhere because nowadays even 40 years old ugly fully clothed women with only a midriff shirt showing some belly skin are considered nsfw and if its not a 40 years old its too young and childporn for sure anyway.... since art ai popped up everybody became hypersensetive, including autodetection systems, while before or maybe at least before the pornhub cleaning nobody cared at all, teen or girl in porn didnt mean childporn and nsfw meant at very least nipples hanging out or whatever. when they fail auto flagging and cant keep up moderating properly but still are scared to get in trouble they should just stick with the mandatory "yes im 18" to enter the site like every porn site does and manually react to manual reportings so before the law they did their job. and people in general need to stop becoming more sensetive since art ai and rather become less sensetive now that more images containing whatever we want to see are gonna float around, and that wont be ugly clothed fat big saggy titted midlfs when using sd1.5 rather than 2.1..... but hey, we dont do kink shaming here...

    ToxicBotMay 21, 2023

    Civiai serves an important role for us, so I hate to bash on them exclusively. It also seems like user content is growing exponentially so I can understand their burden. Censorship is a necessary evil for these companies otherwise the government will get involved. Not because they care about the ai doodles but because it is a powerful weapon they can use to legitimize stealing money from companies and people. Sadly that is our current reality.

    Dead_Internet_TheoryJan 3, 2024· 1 reaction

    It's bullshit, I agree, but they're probably under a lot of heat already.

    I'm pretty sure they ban lolis or other "extreme content" too, which means a lot of stuff won't get posted.

    The only way out of this I can imagine is some distributed platform like torrents, so nothing can ever be taken down no matter who gets their panties in a bunch.

    707607322601May 1, 2023· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    非常好的lora

    OnvisiMay 9, 2023· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    Does this not work at all with realistic models? I usually find anime focused loras still have an effect on realistic models but I can't seem to get this lora to proc no matter how much keywording I throw at it. Any ideas?

    ZophyrMay 14, 2023· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    Where can i get this mixprov4 model? I really liked it!

    Thanks btw for the lora :)

    3676340Mar 29, 2024· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    This is an amazing lora and it works flawlessly on 1.5. Any chance you will train this for pony?

    wewewew
    Author
    Mar 29, 2024· 2 reactions

    I did, it does nearly nothing. This concept is kind of the default behavior in pony, you can use related tags and descriptions and get good results. I might try training it again with new settings, but I won't expect much.

    3676340Mar 29, 2024· 1 reaction

    @wewewew That's sad to read but I understand completely. I wish you luck with the training and will look forward to any developments.