CivArchive
    RealDownblouse - Downblouse & Nipslip LoRA - v2.8
    NSFW
    Preview 667529
    Preview 667236
    Preview 667533
    Preview 667534
    Preview 667520
    Preview 667536
    Preview 667471
    Preview 667497
    Preview 667445
    Preview 667462
    Preview 667501
    Preview 667617
    Preview 673473
    Preview 673477
    Preview 673581
    Preview 673692
    Preview 673706
    Preview 673845
    Preview 678100
    Preview 678111

    This LoRA is intended to cause wardrobe malfunctions. It has two activation keywords: downblouse and nipslip

    Downblouse produces a view down the subject's shirt, while nipslip permits nipples to escape their prisons. The two keywords can be used together (but don't need to be), and can even be used in negative prompts for more control over the composition.

    You can also eschew the trigger words and just increase the weight of the LoRA to encourage wardrobe malfunctions.

    IMPORTANT: Version 3.2 was trained at 640x640 pixels and produces best results at that size or larger; it may produce oversaturated results at smaller resolutions. If your hardware confines you to using smaller resolutions, please use version 2 instead of 3.

    Description

    Larger dataset of better quality images, including nipslips

    FAQ

    Comments (6)

    UnionJackedMay 13, 2023
    CivitAI

    Having a few issues with this producing multiple people. Cannot get this to make just one single subject. Any specific height / width that will help?

    Invisidude
    Author
    May 21, 2023

    Sorry for the delay! Versions 1 and 2 were trained on 512x512. Do you have some example prompts that are resulting in multiple subjects? There was generally only one woman in most of the training images.

    UnionJackedMay 21, 2023· 2 reactions

    @Invisidude Ah maybe thats why. I may have been using 768x768. I'll try with 512. Thank you. love this lora by the way. The more of these the better, an upskirt one would be great! hint hint lol

    hoodadyJul 16, 2023
    CivitAI

    RealDownblouse15_v2.08 why this when you have 2.5?

    Invisidude
    Author
    Aug 11, 2023· 5 reactions

    This has no impact on the output, but 2.8=2.50, it's just a display thing. I realized that this is related to the file metadata. You can configure Automatic1111 to display either the actual file name or the name of the output file that was specified at the time of training. When I was training it, I called the output file 2.50 (version 2, running for 50 epochs), but then I selected the best models from that training run and compared them with extensive testing, ultimately settling on the 8th one. So the file was named 2.08 and that's what I called the version in CivitAI, but there's still some metadata in the file calling it 2.50 because that's what it was called during training.

    RonaldSluggsNov 3, 2023· 1 reaction

    @Invisidude Thanks so much for the clarification. I see so many pictures using the "unattainable" RealDownblouse15_v2.50 😅