CivArchive
    Oral - Oral
    NSFW
    Preview 7747110
    Preview 7747112
    Preview 7747114
    Preview 7747113
    Preview 7747117
    Preview 7747118
    Preview 7747116
    Preview 7747119

    Description

    FAQ

    Comments (6)

    hushichoMar 10, 2024
    CivitAI

    It looks neat, but restricting use so much means fewer people will use it.

    DarkZephyrMar 12, 2024

    Where do you see a list of restrictions? I can't seem to find them.

    wesMar 11, 2024
    CivitAI

    would you please add some more tags, such as 'gay', to this post?

    DarkZephyrMar 11, 2024· 2 reactions

    Why does "gay" need to be added?

    wesMar 12, 2024· 2 reactions

    @DarkZephyr Tags are very descriptive and helpful. They help classify material, make it easy to find, and easy to filter. This one is clearly nsfw and gay, so it's appropriate to label it as such, along with other tags. It helps people that are looking for nsfw and gay LoRAs to more easily find them. Some people wish to filter out nsfw LoRAs entirely and some are not interested in gay LoRAs. This isn't discrimination. It's just showing respect for peoples' preferences and boundaries. It's not a bad idea for straight LoRAs to be labeled as such as well, for the same reasons.

    DarkZephyrMar 12, 2024· 1 reaction

    @wes I see. A "NSFW" label seems reasonable but it seems to me that heterosexual loras rarely get tagged "straight" or "heterosexual" and there are few concerns that seem to get raised by folks interested in only gay NSFW content over that. I know I never raise any ruckuses. That being said, I do agree that more descriptive tags on all loras would be helpful, but I don't see why it should be a problem for anyone not interested in gay NSFW to simply scroll on past them without comment. The sheer number of balloon tit loras, dripping vaginas and gaping female buttholes I have to scroll past on a daily basis just to find the occasional hot guy lora or rare gay nsfw content is extreme. But, I just do it. BTW, I wasn't inferring that your request was discriminatory. I guess I just wonder why gay male content has to be the special case that motivates people to speak up. Why not the straight content? We're not "extra icky" just because we're gay and I'll bet the frequency with which you've ever had to scroll past gay NSFW content in comparison to the frequency with which I've had to scroll past straight content has been pretty minute. I won't protest if "gay" and "NSFW" start getting added to such Loras but lets hope the hetero content gets the same treatment. Have a nice evening.

    LORA
    SD 1.5

    Details

    Downloads
    211
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    3/10/2024
    Updated
    6/20/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    Oral.safetensors

    Mirrors

    CivitAI (1 mirrors)

    384821_training_data.zip

    Mirrors

    CivitAI (1 mirrors)