Update V4:
The weight range is from -1 to 5.
Lighting conditions and body structure are preserved. The image is consistent across the entire area. However, the coverage no longer changes as drastically. At values higher than 5, the nipples may become visible or the entire pose may change.
This slider affects how much coverage a bra provides.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Values between -1 (very much coverage) and 6 (micro bra, very little coverage) yield good results.
If no bra is mentioned in the prompt, the slider adjusts the neckline of the clothing.
The slider has one minor flaw: at higher values, it also changes the brightness. However, this is easily corrected in the prompt. I may try to fix this in a future version.
Description
FAQ
Comments (4)
dang you're fast but i wish it could cover most of the breasts especially the top part at negative weight. it seems to break if i go further down -1.
image example
left is with -1, and the right is with -2.5
maybe the lora will work well with cleavage slider lora im not sure. . .
@monicalucci No... you can't go lower than -1. The bra is a standard bra... not a sports bra. Maybe you should try a sports bra. Or specify that the bra has fully enclosed cups.
@monicalucci Just how much of the breast should a bra cover for a woman with breasts as large as the ones in your picture?
@martindieter I see, it's capped at -1. I'm not too sure how much coverage I want, but I just don't want the woman's cleavage to overpower the image (if you know what I'm saying lol). That's why I felt a cleavage LoRA might help, or maybe I just need to explicitly prompt for a sports bra or full cups to guide the slider better.