CivArchive
    Preview 136179903
    Preview 136179906
    Preview 136179910
    Preview 136179909

    Versions

    • int8: recommended. Fast, accurate, compatible with almost any GPU.

    • mxfp8: added for comparison. In theory (and according to nVidia PR) should be more accurate than int8, but in practice I was not able to spot any definitive advantages. A bit slower than int8, but still faster than original bf16. Compatible only with RTX 50xx series (Blackwell).

    Performance on my setup

    • original bf16 (baseline): 2.20 it/s +0%

    • int8: 3.23 it/s +46%

    • int8 + torch compile (comfy core): 3.59 it/s +63%

    • int8 + turbo lora, cfg=1: 6.50 it/s +295%

    • int8 + turbo lora, cfg=1 + torch compile (comfy core): 7.55 it/s +343%

    • mxfp8: 2.58 it/s +17%


    This is high quality int8 quantized version of base Anima v1.0 model. It retains ~90% of original model quality, but uses about 50% less VRAM and also runs faster on almost any nVidia GPU (AMD not tested). Nice trade-off, especially for low-end GPUs.

    Can be used as a drop-in replacement for original Anima model in latest ComfyUI, no custom nodes required. If you have troubles running the model make sure that you updated both ComfyUI itself and its dependencies (e.g.pip install -U -r requirements.txt on manual linux install).

    Converted to int8 / mxfp8 using convert_to_quant script.

    Description

    Anima-Turbo v1.0.

    int8, ConvRot group size 256, rowwise, learned rounding SVD

    FAQ

    Comments (10)

    ikiru99percentJul 9, 2026
    CivitAI

    Thank you for posting the comparison images. Will make int8 for Aesthetic 1b? It is better than Aesthetic 1 IMO.

    somedoby
    Author
    Jul 9, 2026· 1 reaction

    @ikiru99percent Btw comparison images should have comfy workflow embedded (one custom node for the grid required), so you can test with different prompts / settings. As for the Aesthetic v1b I'll upload it later.

    ikiru99percentJul 9, 2026

    @somedoby Thank you! Great work.

    A1988Jul 9, 2026
    CivitAI

    Turbo V1 int8 is slower than Anima V1 with turbo lora in my PC with RTX 3070.

    Turbo V1 int8: 1.04s/it.

    Anima V1+turbo lora: 1.82it/s.

    VKTralalaJul 9, 2026

    1.04 seconds per iteration is faster than 1.82 mate

    A1988Jul 9, 2026

    @VKTralala 1.82it/s

    somedoby
    Author
    Jul 10, 2026

    @A1988 This is strange. I have no performance problems when generating comparison images. Try to run on fresh comfy install with latest torch and cuda 13.0+.

    krewgJul 9, 2026
    CivitAI

    The quality drop feels a bit more like 20%, but the speed increase is insane, from 360 seconds to 160. You sir have done a wonderful job!

    ikekph5Jul 10, 2026· 1 reaction
    CivitAI

    int4 just landed in ComfyUI 👀

    https://github.com/Comfy-Org/ComfyUI/pull/14859

    somedoby
    Author
    Jul 10, 2026

    Interesting!

    But this bit "A proper quant would have a mix of: pure convrot int4, convrot int4 with int8 matrix mult, convrot int8 and 16 bit precision linears to get the best speed/size/quality." means we probably have wait a while before things are properly sorted out.

    Checkpoint
    Anima

    Details

    Downloads
    379
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    7/9/2026
    Updated
    7/13/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    animaInt8Mxfp8_turboV10Int8.safetensors

    Mirrors

    Available On (1 platform)

    Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.