Currently, the Z-Image base model is producing some poor-quality results with this model. I’ve been trying to improve it, but I’d really appreciate your feedback on which aspects of the model need further work and improvement.
(NSFW support will be available in a future update, so stay tuned! This model is still in development and actively being refined.)
Recommended Parameters
Based on my testing, the best results were achieved with:
Steps: 30
CFG: 2.5
Sampler: Res Multistep
Scheduler: Simple
You can experiment with these settings to find what works best for you!
Description
FAQ
Comments (13)
It seems like ZIB is still not good at nsfw pictures.
The only one good at NSFW is Wan and SDXL. Qwen sucks at it, FLux really sucks at it, HiDream really suck at it and Z-image is the best non suck at it, but still sucks.
@fox23vang226 Just give it time~!
@fox23vang226 try chroma
@kymm I never gave Chroma a shot because the moment I learned it was trained on Flux Schnell I wrote it off. Always hated the aesthetics and quality of Schnell. Even looking at the current sample pics now Im still not impressed at all with it. ZIT sample images blow Chroma out of the water. And if I wanted I could just inpaint the NSFW parts of ZIT images in with SDXL.
@fox23vang226 it's rather strange to compare Chroma/Qwen with SDXL. SDXL released much time ago and have a large horde of finetunes since this time. I remember a time when SDXL was released and first time it wasn't something unusual except its resolution.
Qwen and Chroma released rather recently but good finetunes for Chroma exist.
@fox23vang226 Try the Chroma finetune Spark on HuggingFace. Chroma drifts towards booru content when prompting for NSFW because of the variety of NSFW sources it was trained on, which makes it good for NSW but difficult to prompt for realistic NSFW. Other finetunes seem to have burnt the model by overtraining on porn sources, while the Spark model seems to have been trained on more general, high-quality photos. The full finetune is currently being worked on but the preview it already quite good. SG161222/SPARK.Chroma_preview · Hugging Face
Tip for photorealism is to never mention it or any of the other buzzwords (ultra detailed, hyper-realistic, etc.), just describe the photographic qualities. (“shot on Sony A7IV, clean sharp, high dynamic range”, “film grain, warm color cast, soft focus, 80s vintage photo”, “early digital camera, slight noise, flash photography, 2000s digicam style”, “shot on Kodak Portra 400, natural grain, organic colors”)
@o0Maikeru0o I beg to differ. There are some great base and turbo nsfw checkpoints on here.
Fined tuned on synthetic data or real?
Mixed
@Shopon_Skp partially seedream ?
Eh, looks like SDXL. WE really need to stop using images generated with SDXL sources. That face just screams "this is all you're gonna see now." The original looks better simply because more varied facial features. Also the flowers and such look better too.
Basically, I've not really been a fan of Z image at all simply because every single lora for it turns it into SDXL.
what do you prefer instead, pony XL or FLUX(has its chin issue xD)?