Z-Image Base
Hello! This time I decided to create a new version of my LoRA for Z-image.
Large uncut penises. Unfortunately, I couldn’t find a sufficiently detailed and high-quality LoRA for the Z-image base model, so I decided to train my own. It was a meticulous process. I gathered around 4,000 images for training and rented a server for it. And here is the result.
I’m planning to create a similar LoRA for Flux 2 Klein, as well as other LoRAs focused on male anatomy and gay sex.
If you have any ideas or would like me to train a LoRA for you, I can do it for a reasonable fee - message me on Telegram @lolkagyr
There’s also a donation link for those who would like to support the project. It will help cover server rental costs and the creation of new LoRAs.
https://donatello.to/pavlo_kliuchanskyi
FLUX
A LoRA for uncut penises, trained on a dataset of 500+ images with different angles and close-ups.
The goal was to teach FLUX to generate massive uncut variants with realistic texture and anatomical detail.
The results so far are stable, although there are a few common FLUX-related glitches (for example, the penis sometimes appears in the wrong place or separately in the hand). I plan to continue training and improving quality in the future.
Works best at LoRA weight 0.7–1.0.
I train on a GPU with limited power, so the process takes a lot of time.
If you like my work and want to support further improvements, I’d appreciate a subscription on Patreon or a donation. All support goes towards upgrading my GPU to create even better models.
Description
FAQ
Comments (11)
The testicles could be larger, to balance the size of the penis.
Could anyone share the demo workflow?
none of these are uncut?
Do you know the difference between a circumcised and an uncircumcised penis?
I was surprised to find out that most people don’t know the difference and think that if the foreskin doesn’t cover the glans, then the penis is circumcised. For some reason, this misconception seems especially common among Americans.
dude, are you drunk? Jokes aside, i think english may not be your native language and you're mixing something up.
you just said yourself: "if the foreskin doesn't cover the glans, then the penis is circumcised" -> CUT. Now imagine if the foreskin DID cover the glans, what would that make it? UNcut.
then look at your model images: not a single one, has the foreskin covering the glans. They are all CUT
Now look at your model description : "Large uncut penis"
do you notice the mistake?
@BlackForestGypsy No, that is exactly what I’m calling a misconception. An exposed glans does not automatically mean the penis is circumcised. On an uncircumcised penis, the foreskin can simply be retracted, especially during an erection.
For most men, the foreskin either pulls back or exposes the glans during erection. Also, there is a frenulum between the glans and the shaft/foreskin area, and the frenulum is usually more visible and intact in men who are not circumcised.
@BlackForestGypsy In most circumcised men, the frenulum is absent. In its place, there is either a scar, or the frenulum is severely shortened, so it does not have the same appearance as it does in uncircumcised men.
@Gaydevai_paulo i see what you are saying but then just call it "retracted foreskin". i don't think anyone ever consciously made the frenulum distinction or gives a shit about it other than biology professors.
at face value most people will see a circumcised penis here. if you include "uncut" in your description it is misleading and will lead to a lot of people wasting time.
@BlackForestGypsy I grew up in a country where around 90% of men are uncut, so I know what an uncut penis looks like. Here, circumcision is usually only done for medical reasons, such as phimosis or a short frenulum(when the glans cannot be fully exposed)
I don’t need to be a surgeon or a doctor to understand the visual difference. I specifically asked several dozen friends and acquaintances just now, showed them these generated images, and they all said the penises look uncut.
So I don’t think I’m misleading anyone or creating false expectations.
@Gaydevai_paulo Why not just describe it as "intact frenulum", then? Most people will still expect uncut to mean: foreskin is visible over the glans / extended. But OK. If you say so.
I would still advise you to make that clearer in the description.
I often get private messages, and sometimes comments here, saying that my LoRA doesn’t create uncircumcised penises as if all the penises in the examples look circumcised.
But here’s the thing: I was surprised to realize that many people think that if the foreskin doesn’t cover the glans, even partially, then the penis must be circumcised. Let me broaden your perspective a little: the glans can be exposed while the foreskin is simply pulled back. And you can usually tell by the ridge, the frenulum, and the tissue connecting the glans to the foreskin.
I grew up in a country where around 90% of men have uncircumcised penises, so believe me, I know what an uncircumcised penis looks like.
What I’m curious about is where these misconceptions come from, especially since they seem so common among Americans. Can someone explain why that is?