Adds a little jiggle and bounce to natural body movements. No caption is needed, but adding "jiggle" or "bounce" can add some extra movement.
I highly recommend using both high and low noise versions for local generation. High noise affects larger movements, and low noise affects fingers, indentations, and subtler jiggle.
On-site generation cannot use both LoRAs. I recommend high-noise if you just want bouncing and low noise if you want more subtle results.
Description
Works for all
FAQ
Comments (10)
I have a bug report into support to find out why some LoRAs are not usable with the on-site generator.
Most likely because the giant boob jiggles would dislodge servers in the data center and cause outages.
Hi! Thanks for your lora! Does it also work with buttocks or is it only for boobs?
This was trained mostly on boobs. I can try to produce a training data set for jiggling butts as well and finetune this further for you.
@ComfyTinker jiggle butts might be better as its own lora, depends on the dataset i guess
@ComfyTinker Wow really? That would be awesome!!! I've been looking at the different loras and so far, no lora for Wan has been able to do this correctly, I don't wanna criticize the work of those who made the other loras, but I think jiggling butts is definitely lacking from the lora catalog for now, so it would definitely be a great great addition!! Thanks a lot for considering the idea 🤩
Do t2v WAN loras usually work with i2v as well? Guess I could just test and not be so lazy...
Yes, they typically do. I2V can be slightly easier to train, as it's less likely to overtrain.
I set up a queue overnight when I find interesting LoRas, set maybe 21 frames or so each, iterating weights, cfg, shift, etc in batches with a shared seed. IMO the closer your source is to the prompt, the more useful they are and sometimes one seed will nail it and a hundred others will do nothing. Kind of the opposite of overtrained I2V ones that just spit out the same boring thing every time and clog up this site with garbage.
Thanks!