CivArchive
    Preview 109870357
    Preview 109871032
    Preview 109871038
    Preview 109870505
    Preview 109870685
    Preview 109984712
    Preview 109870689
    Preview 109984516
    Preview 109870688
    Preview 109870551
    Preview 109870684
    Preview 109870276
    Preview 109870686
    Preview 109870687
    Preview 109870681
    Preview 109871039
    Preview 109871034
    Preview 109984678
    Preview 109871412

    Some cover images are prompts created by you guys and alot from @GayPurpleSkunk (A pro at genning with furry models) If you notice you're prompt DM me for compensation!

    WOW! You guys got both XXX-tended editions online from bidding! Y'all really like that series, eh?

    Version VANTABLACK (READ ME)

    Updated to MegaCock V2 and REED_FURRY_MIX
    Color, vibrancy, and contrast are adjusted.
    Prompt adherence is more sensitive
    Clean, crisp, HQ output.
    any blotchyness or blur removed.

    Version XXX-TENDED v2.0 (READ ME)

    This version uses an entirely different base model known as "Mega Cock"

    it is appearently a checkpoint trained model focused on delivering highly detailed, cinematic, and creativity for NSFW, Fantasy and anime content. Still delivers that glossy, shiny, 2.5D look, but with more detail and better posing.

    Anatomy & Poses - 9/10
    Seems to get creative with poses, dynamic angles, shockingly good at getting full body or 3/4th body shots with good eyes.

    Also appears to do duo very well with eyes, and full body.

    fingers, mostly gives furries 4 or 5 fingers. Mostly 5, but here and there 4 fingers in springled in. Chance of finger failure is pretty low.

    Prompt Adherence - 7/10
    Great adherence, can get good results with a basic detailed prompt, but detailed prompting results in a finer tuned result.

    Version XXX-TENDED (READ ME)

    Base aesthetic cleaned up.

    Better anatomy,

    Less male gender bias.

    • I know you guys love using Yiff in Hell for the huge glossy boobs.
      and this model amplifies that affect.

    • For my gay bros, thick shiny asses and glossy thick cocks are locked and loaded.

    Clean, Smooth, Glossy, as ever.

    Awesome NSFW knowledge.

    High Customizable via LoRA's for NSFW concepts

    Backgrounds are about the same as V3/V4 ish.

    Further Improved chances of perfect outcome without inpainting

    Extremely strong prompt adherence

    • This means more detailed the prompt, the better the outcome

    • This almost understands natural language in a scary accurate way sometimes.

    • No need for prompt strenghts of (1.3) or higher. Recognized tags are already potent

    You can choose to extend the power of each of these baked in LoRA's to finetune your results.
    Rule34 V2

    Pornmaster add detail

    Gay Porn Extender

    Gay Painterly Mix (Bara/Kemono)

    All of these work harmonously if you dont want to add more of them to the model, and wont affect other lora's you choose.


    Try out these embeddings too if you hate writing quality tags!

    Lazy Embedding Collection

    AssistXLv2

    UnaestheticXL_cbp62

    NegativeXL_D

    • Steps: 24

    • Resolution: Portrait(832x1216), Square(1024x1024) Landscape(1216x832)

    • HiRes Multiplier: 1, 1.2, 1.5(best on A1111 and its forks)

    • Hires fix steps: 12

    • Sampler: Euler A(Auto, Beta, SGM Uniform), LCM,

    • CFG 2 - 4

    • Supports 512~1536 resolutions from its Illustrious 2.0 base

    2.5D Photorealistic / Fuller Realism

    masterpiece, ultra-HD, photorealistic, impressionism, high detail, depth of field, dynamic lighting, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, best quality, realistic, muted colors palette. anthro


    2.5D Semi-Realism with impressionism(painterly)

    masterpiece, ultra-HD, impressionism, high detail, depth of field, dynamic lighting, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, best quality, anthro,

    2.5D-3D (Ultra Quality)

    masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, high resolution, ultra-detailed, 32k, UHD, absurdres, newest, scenery, furry, anthro

    2.5D Semi-Realism (High Quality)

    masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, high resolution, ultra-detailed, absurdres, newest, scenery, furry, anthro,

    2.5D (Simple Quality)

    masterpiece, best quality, newest, absurdres, highres, anthro,

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Version 4

    Total modification of base aesthetic.
    YES - the rule 34 v2 is still in this.
    Suprisingly creative, good dynamic poses
    Cleaner, Smoother, AND GLOSSY
    Background details are slightly decreased
    Backgrounds are more coherent and fitting.
    Prompt Adherence is pretty solid.

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Version 3

    Big imporovements on base aesthetic.
    Increased creativity and poses
    Cleaner, smoother, 2.5D look
    More detailed backgrounds

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Version 2

    One of the big things I wanted to announce with this version, is the addition of the all new Rule 34 dataset V2.

    This will greatly improve prompt adherence, aesthetic and NSFW knowledge.

    ALSO IF YOU NOTICE YOUR PROMPT USED IN THE COVER IMAGES DM ME FOR COMPENSATION.

    READ ME!

    • Includes rule 34 dataset

    • Includes training data from top rated furry images on Civitai and e6ai.

    • Highly detailed backgrounds

    • Has really good knowledge of sex acts and positions.

    • Can do 2.5D all the way up to semi-realism.

    • Steps: 30

    • Hires fix steps: 15

    • Sampler: Euler A(Auto), DPM++ 2M(karras), DPM++ 2M SDE (Karras)

    • CFG 4.5

    • Resolution: supports 512~1536 resolutions

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Description

    [Working on description]

    FAQ

    Comments (56)

    MysticFrostwindNov 12, 2025· 7 reactions
    CivitAI

    Thanks for update king!

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Nov 12, 2025· 1 reaction

    Youre very welcome! I gotchu!

    dystopicaleNov 12, 2025· 5 reactions
    CivitAI

    omg

    the best model on this site got one more update hahaha now I need to dive into this one.

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Nov 12, 2025

    I try to do an update atleast once a month, lol!

    dystopicaleNov 13, 2025

    @LatteLeopard makes sense. I think I never noticed before hahahahahah
    anyway, thanks. Top-5 models ever. I really love this one

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Nov 14, 2025

    @dystoipa Thanks dude, I appreciate it!

    GayPurpleSkunkNov 12, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    This looks so cool. :D I can't wait to try it out!

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Nov 12, 2025· 1 reaction

    You're gonna love this one, hopefully~!

    Keryesh4kaNov 13, 2025· 8 reactions
    CivitAI

    I like this model, made arts by me based on this!

    JabalabaNov 13, 2025· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    Since the first version, I've used solely this model(from v1 to XXX). No matter what I try with other models, none can match its ability to generate both furry and non-furry content, or work with LORAs as effectively. However, I have a question or rather a suggestion. As I tried many things, I noticed that this model has some problems when using reference images, poses, face changes, and other ControlNet stuff. Can I do something about that? Or could you try looking at it, because you probably know more about how checkpoints work than I do. (Or is that absolutely okay and have no real solution)

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Nov 14, 2025

    I dont really use controlnet, but I gave it a test run in A1111 and seemed to be able to get the results I wanted. Are you perhaps using comfyui?

    Tbh I will look into this for future models for comfyui users if thats the issue.

    Thank you for your support! ♥

    JabalabaNov 15, 2025

    @LatteLeopard 
    Thank you for respond, yeah i'm using comfyui, but as i thought controlnet working same in automatic and comfyui, no? so sometimes YIH can follow poses but not always, and it has some problems while getting poses from pictures/images. As far as i know from tests YIH v1 has better pose following of all. Most frustrating part is reference image. even if i use image what was generated on same YIH it has color issues (i dunno maybe it is okay and it should work this way). but at least depth map is working just fine (that allows to play with poses and camera angle/perspective more freely)

    TheGarandMannNov 25, 2025

    Best profile picture I've seen bro

    JabalabaNov 25, 2025

    @TheGarandMann thanks bro) i love this picture too

    RytlockRedstoneNov 14, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    May I ask about the main differences between YIF and BananaOh_Number?

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Nov 14, 2025· 2 reactions

    Banana Splitz is more 2d and flat. Yiff in Hell is semi realistic 2.5D

    RytlockRedstoneNov 15, 2025· 2 reactions

    @LatteLeopard Thanks for your answer!

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Nov 17, 2025· 4 reactions

    @RytlockRedstone I feel like my previous response was kinda half assed, and just in case others have this question I want to answer it more thoughtfully.

    Yiff in Hell is like Nova furry or Plant Milk - Flax,

    Banana Splitz is like WAI-NSFW or Mol Kuen. its a 50/50 mix of eastern and western toon look. Some versions have thicker linework then others.

    Spoiler: Banana Splitz V8 will be thick lined, and more westernized, as that was the feedback I recieved when I asked on discord.

    My other models Like iffyMix uses YiffyMix V52/51 Mix as base and is meant to look very cartoonish. Way more angular lines than smooth ones. Thickline work that can be colored sometimes. Shading looks like your average furry artist. Nothing intense. Very colorful. Works well with alot of artist LoRA's

    Stormtooth XL is Yiff in Hell on steroids. Its very realistic. Based on Diving Illustrious and Illustrious Lima (removed from site)

    Indigo Latte Mix - A properly cleaned up version of Indigo with modifications to give better detail. The creator merges his models from Pony -> SDXL -> NoobAI and doing this caused alot of artifacting because Pony and NoobAI dont have the same UNET.

    So he basically merged them together with duck tape and faith, while I took the time to properly correct the Unet blocks using other illustrious models I could do patch work with.

    No disrespect to him, He still crafted the aesthetic and look of the model. He also is very talented to figure out how to merge Pony with NoobAI. I give him mad props. Very innovative dude. Even without my modifications his models give nice results. I just wanted to "HD" it up.

    RytlockRedstoneNov 18, 2025

    @LatteLeopard Okay, thank you for your reply. I'd like to know if underscores are needed when calling characters from these two models? Are their tags similar to those in E621? (For example, tank_top and torahiko_(morenatsu))

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Nov 18, 2025· 1 reaction

    @RytlockRedstone Illustrious doesnt use underscores for the most part. So no its not really required.

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Nov 18, 2025· 2 reactions

    With Illustrious I dont believe you need underscores.

    so you dont have to use it with any Illustrious models. NoobAI inlcuded.

    Other checkpoints that are TRAINED like RouWei or Janku might change how prompting works. but all the models you see labeled checkpoint merged should work the same with prompting.

    JabalabaNov 25, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    I trained LORA with your checkpoint model as custom model to get better and more precise results. So this Lora made right for your checkpoint. As far as i know it is okay right?
    https://civitai.com/posts/24664214

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Nov 27, 2025

    Yeah its okay. It looks great!

    JabalabaNov 27, 2025

    @LatteLeopard THNX ;) Love your models btw.

    refactoredxNov 27, 2025· 5 reactions
    CivitAI

    LOVE IT.

    depravitystationNov 29, 2025· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    Any ways to pinpoint and remove the lighter fur tones for the chest/belly etc? Kind of annoying when I want to gen a character with a mono color fur.

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Dec 7, 2025· 1 reaction

    I never thought about that until now, because SO many furry characters follow the coat patterns of their actual animal. But you can try putting two tone fur in the negatives and raising its weight. example: (two tone fur:1.2)

    I dont know if solo or single tone fur is a e621 tag. but it might work.

    Try the method using the negatives first. I think that would work best.

    depravitystationDec 8, 2025

    @LatteLeopard thanks, hopefully it works, if you ever do an update, something to make single tones only a bit easier would be really nice

    DetrianDec 9, 2025

    @depravitystation Try doing like (white fur:1.3) or whatever color. Sometimes you have to go higher than 1.3 but the AI usually gets it.

    JabalabaDec 3, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    just for info, i've been posting using your model for a 5 months, since 1 version of this checkpoint and never managed to get into pinned posts even while i use a lot of manual post refinement to get rid of all artifacts from generations. So i get curious, what's the case:
    1) i post not so frequently and not too much.
    2) because of refinement and inpainting my works doesen't looks like something your model can generate from start (and you not pin it because even if it's your model it uses inpainting (still with your model) and other users might get confused).
    3) my works just boring?) or not your thing?
    4) it's just never get into your attention and it's random.

    I'm not trying to push you into something, I'm just really frankly curious. Cuz i trying my best to squeze all it greatness from your models, to show how awesome it can make when you put some work into prompts + inpaint even on low res (i have some works in lower res while i has weaker GCard).
    And as you might remember from my last questions i'm doing some loras aimed to work best with your YIH checkpoints because i use only them from all i've tried.
    P.S. as any author i think my works are really cool, no merged bodies, no 6fingers, no broken proportions, so i thought my works should stand out from others and because of that i decided to ask not for something to profit but just to understand possible reasons.

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Dec 5, 2025

    Hey I apprecaite you using my model. I would have prefered you sent me a DM, but I understand yellow buzz is becoming difficult for non paying members or content creators.

    I get your frustration, but it has nothing to do with the quality of your work. Its mostly a time based thing. Earlier posts have an extremely high likelyhood to end up pinned.

    After viewering your account, you only have about 38 images, but they are great quality for the most part.

    I will send you buzz, because I legitmately feel bad that you feel frustrated with all this.

    GayPurpleSkunkDec 16, 2025

    posts generally get traction based on how quickly they're uploaded once a new model is posted. that's literally all there is to it

    JabalabaDec 16, 2025

    @GayPurpleSkunk the thing is i made and uploaded like 3-4 separate works in different styles and diff chars (furry, not furry, NSFW and even SFW)
    my posts that i'm talking about:
    https://civitai.com/posts/24331003
    https://civitai.com/posts/24330560
    https://civitai.com/posts/24340357
    https://civitai.com/posts/24339895

    and even like that my works wasn't pinned. there was only about 15-20 other posts at the moment with more 'default' ai generation quality.
    so even between other 15-20 posts mine wasn't get attention for 'pinning'(and my posts had more reactions than posts of others which made me wondering how can it be (my posts was around 7-10 reactions while others got around 4))
    and again, i'm not arguing i'm just was surprised

    *my thoughts back then*:
    my posts had better quality than posts that there right now (check)
    i have like 4 posts right at the start of model (check)
    none posts pinned yet (check)
    i have more people reactions than any others (check)
    doesn't that mean i can get my posts pinned??? (check???)

    and actually somehow... no
    what can i say. unlucky)

    yukifoxyDec 19, 2025· 1 reaction

    This is such a weird thing to complain about o_O Have you seen how many images are being posted, constantly? On top of that, there are so many people FLOODING with posts that are slight variations of the same prompt.

    Moreover, IMHO your entire gallery is really not that interesting. Poses and characters are very plain/boring, styles aren't so great, composition is nearly non-existent, themes are niche (not everyone is into futa, most of your gallery is invisible to me because of this), and half of your gallery isn't even furry, which I assume is the target audience for a model called "Yiff in hell", even if the author will definitely claim otherwise.

    Just compare yourself what's actually pinned: you are simply far below that level of quality at this point in time.

    That said, it's really nice that you're putting efforts into what you post, especially with the manual refinement like inpainting. You can only improve from there!

    JabalabaDec 19, 2025

    @yukifoxy  first of all as i already said i was not complaining and was curious
    2 as i already mentioned before there was not so much posts at the moment and no so much flooding
    3 if you just check my previous comm you can see all 4 posts doesen't have any futas on non straight content
    4 futas actually not so niche right now and i can see a few pinned futa posts (futas draw more attention than casual NSFW).
    5 i can see why you think poses are boring but any other complains just matter of taste. i don't like huge body parts mostly and over glossy thingy so, my work not contain this most of the times. But, bro don't even tell me about 'composition on image' on this site). adding a few tags for composition and overcomplification isn't doing you an composition expert. i know i'm doing simple views, that's my choice and i know that might be boring(but RN i mostly experimenting and trying to work on other things, cuz overbeautyfication is already cheap on this site.)
    6 yeah i already guessed about humans posted in furry base model and doing them just because this is something different so there's no need to tell me about this
    7 saying "Just compare yourself what's actually pinned: you are simply far below that level of quality at this point in time." made me laugh actually. i can cleary see merged bodies, double bulges, another pair of testicles instead of tail, artifacts, overall mid image quality and many more, so i'm not trying to hurt someone's feelings about this because it's okay for ai generations, but my works don't have this things because i refined them and because of that i know it's absolutely not worse than works of other people.
    8 as i can see you're refining your works too, that's great, i can tell a lot of things that not so great about them if you're interested not only in discussing other's works, but overall they're better than most of this site's works and i'm not going to put some dirt on you thinking i'm a huge critic.
    9 you're not into my styles i'm not into your styles and this is okay.

    i asked author of this model and i get my CURIOSITY satisfied, so theres no need to get on me thinking i'm complaining about something.
    i can make a really cool 10+ char work without merging, artifacts, with interesting concept and eyecatching viewpoint, but i know there will be people who just don't found this beautiful and will think it's not so good as you just did. So RN i'm comfortable with as it is. post some good looking images, with high pixel quality but not so time consuming. and spending my free time on learning new instruments and lora training instead.
    i know my works is good, i know they're not ideal and have some flaws, but at least they're without random objects, irrational AI things, and artifacts.

    P.S. sorry if my answer was rough, i'm not native english and can make some writing mistakes and aggressive lines because my vocabulary 'not so BIG' to make answer more polite sometimes.

    yukifoxyDec 20, 2025

    @Jabalaba re-read your original post. Saying you're not complaining as part of your complain doesn't change anything. You are still, in fact, complaining.

    It's also interesting how you get so defensive as soon as you receive criticism. Let me put it in another way: do you honestly think your gens are amongst the best for this model? Because typically, that's what the curators is looking for (though it seems a bit different here).

    Now, if you're generating just for yourself and you're fully satisfied already, that's totally cool. Just don't expect others to have the same standards as you do.

    JabalabaDec 20, 2025

    @yukifoxy it was no a compliant at all). i thought there is some unwritten rules maby how you can get in there and i was interested in this base model author opinion about something and i get it.
    i literally just asked him maybe my works lacks this or that? cuz if it has something what isn't his liking maybe i can try something to show his model better with my works.
    and even try myself in preference oriented content.
    i love this model and has nothing to complain about, cuz i can use it for free like anyone else. as i wrote later directly in his DM's "since i spend a lot of time to generations i thought i can get there and it will be cool(but i didn't and i'm okay with it, it's life)"
    even if i will be sure i making greatest works of all time that doesn't mean someone or something must bend to my will. because it's okay to not get that you want. and the one and only thing i was interested in this moment is to ask a questions about my works right from author of model i making content for. i dunno maybe some of my questions was not so great thing to ask.
    2) "It's also interesting how you get so defensive as soon as you receive criticism." it's interesting because i was not waiting criticism from anyone else except author of my beloved model. if the author will tell me my works are not so good i will consider it and try to do better for him and his model. so seeing someone i don't see as good creator teaching how my styles arent so great for him, kinda strange. so right in this situation you just jumped out of nowhere to "teach" me but actually telling me about things that mostly just matter of taste. in my own opinion if work made in high quality it's more important than just feedin prompts with expressive views, while having ai artifacts. i know this all is important too, but as i said RN i focused on other things and then i get bored by my simple viewpoints i will do something completely different (but actually i already have some interesting works that i just don't want to upload on site at least now). like each of my work on this site is trying something new, like regional prompting, three different char loras at once without merging, drawing by myself etc. i will consider some of your opinions too, but actually before telling me about me being 'defensive' when i'm actually being kinda polite to someone's wrong way to critic. you could've asked do i want one, i would tell you i do and you tell me where i messed up and not just 'your styles are boring, all of this above average, poses bad' leaving me as an author with a lot of questions like: what you don't like in my styles? lines? too much cartoon? what is bad in that pose? so yeah, bad critic and kinda aggressive one.
    3) "Let me put it in another way: do you honestly think your gens are amongst the best for this model? Because typically, that's what the curators is looking for (though it seems a bit different here)." i hope i get it right and by curator you mean author of this base model. so i asked and i get my answer, no hard feeling or something. so yeah, they're looking for good works, but they might not have enough time to watch each one work closely, so ofc it hard to notice without full screen view that my works made in high quality and post rework. (because miniatures on this site is kinda small)
    4) i didnt expect others to have standarts like me, i just know my works made in good quality and was asking from author maybe i can do something better or i'm not getting into unwritten rules i said earlier.

    yukifoxyDec 20, 2025

    @Jabalaba maybe it's just purely a matter of taste. I tried to have another look at your gallery to provide a more detailed critique, but I just can't. The quality is too low and the themes are just repulsive to me.

    If you can't see there is a difference between what you do and the best pics for this model by yourself, I guess no argument will convince you anyway.

    I do wish you the best, and keep having fun with SD though!

    JabalabaDec 20, 2025

    @yukifoxy repulsive to you? females, males, futas, all is repulsive to you. and you know why? because you just can't just admit that you was rude at the first place. and no matter that i'll post you're going to put dirt on it anyway.
    you're posting femboys only. that's not something popular either as you said about futas (even though i didn't post only futas and post various content to get wider attention), but i'm not trying to put a dirt on you in return.
    "quality is low" and "if you can't see it by yourself" showing how much of a critic you are, telling about how "obvious it is" without any prof is a genius move. i'm not someone who need to be argued with. you said my composition are boring most of the times and i can agree with that. but about my styles is a pure BS, like i have nearly 70 works using different styles, even popular ones, from cartoon, sketchy, 3d, semi realistic, and you still don't like it, looks like you're just trying to find things to trash me for no reason. if you can tell me a real things which of mine works sucks and why i'm not going to crash out on you. but RN you're just playing critic and throwing general words instead of something real. and by the way IMHO if you're seeing default AI generated artifact works and tell me it's OVERALL better than all my works than you might really not teach someone about good and interesting.

    you have like at least 70-80 percent of your works without any composition and interesting viewpoint by yourself and telling me i have this problem? do you know why i'm not telling you about how bad it is? because it's no bad, most of the pinned posts for example have simple viewpoint too, simple viewpoint is classic adn that doesnt make any work completely boring because of that. i don't have any hate towards you, but i really don't get why you was so aggressive from the start.
    maybe you don't like my works because i make a thick gens and you love mostly femboy small things, so as i said it's the matter of taste.

    PS. there is no comments or insults hidden so stop being so aggressive towards me with no reason. if you want to be constructive be constructive. i can tell you honest moments in your works that you missed out if you want and just because i don't like something about themes or proportions that doesnt mean i'm going to put dirt on you.

    GayPurpleSkunkDec 20, 2025· 1 reaction

    this forum is not reddit. jesus christ

    JabalabaDec 20, 2025

    @GayPurpleSkunk i'm really sorry... i will gladly chat with this user in DM if he stop answering me there.

    JabalabaDec 20, 2025

    or should i just delete this comment section? i really sorry if i hurt someone's feelings or if it were wrong towards author of this Base model. maybe it was arrogant to ask something like that, but it was more like "maybe i can do better content for your model" in my point of view.
    it's kinda wrong to discuss something like that under someone's model
    @LatteLeopard i'm so sorry for all that and if i did something wrong by asking. and i can't stop to telling that i love your model <3

    GayPurpleSkunkDec 20, 2025

    @Jabalaba it's all good, I just kept getting pinged in this comment thread. I'd appreciate it if y'all took it to dms ^^

    AnotherBlackDragonDec 5, 2025· 4 reactions
    CivitAI

    The "Gay Painterly Mix (Bara/Kemono)" link point towards direct download (instead of the model's page, as the other 3 does)

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Dec 5, 2025· 2 reactions

    Ty for pointing that out! I fixed it now so it links to the page.

    I appreciate you letting me know.

    Its important that the users can see the page and insturctions.

    AnotherBlackDragonDec 5, 2025· 1 reaction

    No problem! I really love YiH, you're making amazing checkpoints <3

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Dec 13, 2025· 1 reaction

    @AnotherBlackDragon sorry for the late response, but thank you for your kind words. I really appreciate the feeedback

    raphielleDec 6, 2025· 2 reactions
    CivitAI

    any alternative for nai

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Dec 7, 2025

    hmm? What do you mean?

    raphielleDec 7, 2025

    @LatteLeopard any similar models for noob ai?

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Dec 8, 2025

    @raphielle In terms of trained checkpoints and not merges?
    hassaku, Janku, RouWei, and ChenkinNoob are all trained checkpoints like NoobAI.

    Is that what you meant?

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Dec 8, 2025

    Just so you know these are really best meant for model mergers to use for finetuning. More so than generating. Including NoobAI itself.

    raphielleDec 13, 2025

    @LatteLeopard no i meant is there anything like THIS for noob

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Dec 13, 2025· 1 reaction

    @raphielle this has NoobAI 1.1 EPS

    All the model merges you you see are hybrids of illustrious 2.0 + NoobAI 1.1 EPS

    Some extend further with rouwei or hassaku.

    Anyhow I can assure you this has illustrious 2.0 + NoobAI

    I dont list any models as NoobAI, because, NoobAI is still just illustrious with extra training.

    In terms of newest, and most data.

    Illustrious 2.0 is best

    Then NoobAI

    Followed by illustrious 0.1

    So, dont worry. Any model merge you see listed as illustrious or NoobAI, by now has all been mashed together.

    LatteLeopard
    Author
    Dec 13, 2025· 1 reaction

    @raphielle I just want to make sure im explaining this correctly.

    NoobAI is illustrious, it was the first CHECKPOINT TRAINED version of illustrious so they jumped the gun and gave NoobAI its own category.

    Also most model mergers combine illustrious 2.0 and NoobAI 1.1

    That's like the golden standard.

    The_Wolf_Who_Sold_MatchesDec 8, 2025· 3 reactions
    CivitAI

    this is helpful!

    Checkpoint
    Illustrious

    Details

    Downloads
    3,235
    Platform
    CivitAI
    Platform Status
    Available
    Created
    11/11/2025
    Updated
    6/12/2026
    Deleted
    -

    Files

    yiffInHell_yihXXXTended.safetensors

    Mirrors

    Available On (1 platform)

    Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.