Overview
CinePerspective enhances control over camera angles and perspectives in image generation. This LoRA fine-tunes native angle capabilities while adding specialized viewpoints.
Activation & Usage
Base trigger: cineperspective Format: <lora:CinePerspective:1>, cineperspective, [specific_angle]
Camera Angles
Classic Angles (Enhanced)
dutch angle: Tilted/diagonal composition creating tension or disorientation
high angle: Camera above subject, looking down
low angle: Camera below subject, looking up
overhead view: Direct 90° view from above
Camera Levels (Enhanced)
aerial view: High altitude overview showing environment context
eye level view: Natural perspective at subject's eye height
ground level view: Extreme low position at floor level (still challenging in some scenes)
hip level view: Mid-body framing, slightly below eye level
knee level view: Camera positioned at knee height
shoulder level view: Slightly elevated perspective, ideal for portraits
New Perspectives (v1.3)
over the shoulder: View from behind one subject looking at another/object
three-quarter view: 45° angle perspective - balanced profile/frontal view
pov: First-person perspective simulating subject's viewpoint
Limit combinations to 2-3 descriptors for best results.
Note: This LoRA fine-tunes many angles that work natively but provides more consistent results and specialized perspectives that can be difficult to achieve reliably with base models alone.
Description
- Expanded dataset by 74% for improved angle precision
- Added 3 new specialized camera perspectives:
Over the shoulder view
Three-quarter view (45° angles)
POV (first-person perspective)
- Fine-tuned existing angles for better consistency
FAQ
Comments (5)
It works great, but I wish it had front/side views, for lying on a couch or bed, thats really difficult to do natively without controlnet.
I understand what you mean! Side/front views for lying poses are indeed tricky with the current triggers. I might add specific lying angle controls in the next version.
I posted some tests here: https://civitai.com/posts/17811402/ - curious if any of these approaches help with your use case.
@stellabawerte421 definitely in the right direction, just wish the view was more straight, it looks like those still default to a 3 quarters view.
@Starry_Eyes Yeah, you're right - still looks more like 3/4 view than pure side. I think I'll expand the dataset soon and release an update.
@Starry_Eyes Made a separate LoRA for this: https://civitai.com/models/1665263
Try "sidelying" + weight 0.8-1.0, maybe add "profile" for cleaner side angles. Still experimental but should give you the straight views you wanted.
Details
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.