SD seems to love big breasts. But not all people prefer them too. Even most of the NSFW Lora's for SDXL only produce big ones. This is a Lora for really small breasts.
SD 1.5 Version: https://civarchive.com/models/285031?modelVersionId=320676
Read the "About this version" to get the best results.
I have nothing against 5* ratings, but please refrain from doing so if this LoRA has obviously not been used...
I recommend a strength between 08 and 1.25.
I strongly recommend the "flat chested" versions. Other versions are experimental.
Hopefully it is clear that this LoRA may not be used to create underage or otherwise illegal content
Feel free to share the images you created with this LoRA if you like. I'm excited to see what others here have done with it.
There are not many tutorials for training NSFW stuff. So I am absolutely no expert either.
For this LoRA everything in the image was tagged except for the breasts. For the head I made it easy and it was either not on the pictures or I just tagged it with "head". Not much different than for SFW stuff.
Description
This version has been trained with a data set twice as large. Generally, the results are better, but there are a few things to keep in mind.
I recommend using the checkpoint Juggernaut XL. DreamShaper XL1.0 gave worse results with this version.
I also recommend using Hires. fix here.
Unfortunately, this version tends to cut off the head. Therefore, either prompt against it or use the dimensions 896x1152. I then use Hires. fix to change the width to 1024. Upscaler latend and denoising strenght 0.53
FAQ
Comments (9)
These tits are too small man
i don't think so. If they are too small for you just don't use this LoRA :)
you misspelled cute, man ;)
Maybe he was ref to the nipples? Cause not all small tits have small nipples.
@Explatord they just look like underdevelloped instead of the tiny tits of an actual woman with tiny tits. It's weird to me
@letmeinlol You and I agree, these breasts don't look small to me. They rather look early puberty, thus not yet developed.
@letmeinlol @Repsirch i don't think you ever have seen woman with real flat chests. But i don't think there is anything i can do to change your mind. So just ignore this Lora?
@Explatord, It's not a question of whether women with extremely flat chests exist or how prevalent they are. That's not my concern.
The crux of the issue, for me, lies in understanding and acknowledging the implications of using AI tools to create such images. When we create and share content, especially content that might be seen as sensitive or controversial, it's important to consider the messages we're sending and the norms we're potentially reinforcing.
I'm not suggesting we censor artistic expression or personal preferences. Diversity in art is vital. However, with the power of these advanced tools comes a responsibility to reflect on the kind of content we are amplifying. Each of us has a different threshold for what we deem acceptable or ethical, and that's to be expected in a diverse society.
For me, personally, this Lora crosses a line. This isn't an indictment of your artistic skill or your right to create, but an expression of my personal discomfort with this specific creation. I respect your freedom to create as you wish, just as I choose to distance myself from works that I find problematic.
I hope this comment opens up a dialogue about the broader implications of our creative choices in the realm of AI-generated art.
@Repsirch well, more or less the same could be said for breasts on the opposite extreme of the size spectrum, but please let's not argue over cup sizes, ok? adult women with this body type do exist, some like it, some not. but variety is awesome
Details
Available On (1 platform)
Same model published on other platforms. May have additional downloads or version variants.