Put the model under models/adetailer
Only tested with realistic and semi-realistic images. There is no anime / cartoon images in the training data.
Description
All things fantasy. Exotic skin color, scaled skin, vfx effects. This will likely lead to false positives, so keep the stable version installed while you experiment with this.
FAQ
Comments (21)
very nice
Thank you! Thats very kind of you.
What are the differences between versions? 3.2, fantasy 4?
3.2 is the stable version for everything human. 4.0 adds a lot of training data for fantasy purposes.
@Jellon so better to use both, and use 4.0.in csse we have lizard people? :P
@Malessar Exactly. I plan on expanding the model with more fantasy and sci-fi training data in the future, but for those who just want a stable human model, the 3.2 will serve well.
This has been super reliable. Would you consider doing a navel / stomach adetailer model as well? This one actually helps a bit there too, but between using a face model, this one, and your pussy one, the only area left is the stomach - and that part ends up looking low resolution by comparison. Thank you.
Thanks for the suggestion, that's actually something I could consider and a really good suggestion. I think it would actually add a good amount of value.
Don't expect anything anytime soon as compiling a quality dataset requires quite a bit of of time, but I'll continue to think about this. Maybe it's worth the the effort.
@Jellon You're the best. Thanks for taking it into consideration!
@Jellon Hey! Just wanted to check in - curious to see if you've made headway here. Zero expectation on my end, and a lot has changed in the past 7 months, but this would still be super useful to my workflows. Thank you!
@kurokuro Sorry I don't really have the time to compile a good dataset for this at the moment.
@Jellon Gotcha. I'm kind of in the same boat, but this is still something I'd love to see eventually. Could you share what a good dataset looks like for you (i.e. what you used to train this model here), and I can try to get something started?
@kurokuro I need around 500 images from all different angles, skin colors, obstructions. Around 80% positives and 20% negatives. That's really the hard part.
Then I need to tag all the images appropriately, but I can do that.
Both the breast and the vagina model have ~1000 images each in their training data, but 500 should already give a pretty good quality.
@Jellon so you say that the 20% of the images that are negative are "really the hard part." Tell me more, sir. I have much buzz I can provide as an encouragement.
What makes it hard, how do you succeed, what does a good resulting set of negative images comprise?
I'm still not using it, but I'm using the Hands, and if I don't use any Prompt then it's easy to turn the Hands into a Human, and I'm wondering if I should type in a Prompt, such as the Breasts and Pussy that you've made（My English is not good, so I use Google Translate.）.
Yes definitely use a prompt. Never leave the prompt empty. Also use low denoise strength.
works well with a "detailed skin textures" type prompt,
@Jellon what do you suggest putting in the Adetailer prompt? All this time I never did. But I had decent results without a prompt in the Adetailer field.
@blueeyedtex627 Test it out with regular inpainting. It really depends on which model you're using. If you get consistent good results via regular inpainting, it'll work with ADetailer too.