The model I think is fairly self explanatory.It is curious what I've seen, or at least heard of, of shows I've never watched.I was never a big Lord of The Rings guy, I read the Twin Towers, and the hobbit, never read the extended stuff, tried fellowship of the ring, but I was told Twin Towers had the most action, my brother was big into it all, never really gave return of the king a shot, but that one I'd think as a book would have been my favorite.I did enjoy the movies, but they are kind of hard to go back to for me, they're movies that deserve to be seen on a big screen in a theater, not on a computer side monitor. So I'll not likely get the 'true' experience for maybe another decade or two again, they'll play em again on some big anniversary I'm sure. Like when they did the last time and I put out the Balrog model and femboy balrog model.But The Rings of Power? Even Chris says that his friends, who are big into Lord of The Rings, didn't really like the show.But one thing came out to me of note, the female dwarf, and I'm not sure what's really going on with it.Because Aragorn, when Gimli in the movies is asked has anyone ever seen a female dwarf, he says the way to tell them apart is the beards.Apparently dwarf women are supposed to have beards? I'm not entirely sure, I'm not sure if it's ever explicitly shown in the LOTR movies, maybe the books? because apparently they're relatively indistinguishable, outside of the beards.The hobbit movie, did it have any female dwarves? I didn't watch it. I don't think the book had any.But people point out the point of contention that I've seen, is the black woman dwarf, is just, uh, black, and doesn't have a beard, which going with the LOTR movies, I mean, what you can assume from Aragorn pointing out the difference is 'something' about the beards, I mean, it seems like a callback to that? That the distinguishing factor between male and female dwarves is that the females don't have any.Makes sense to me? Anyway to get to the point and I'll be short, people don't think about it they're just mad that it's a black dwarf. That's why they made her a black dwarf, it was because they knew it would make you angry. You might have noticed the beard, but you fell for an old marketing trick.They made that skincolor characteristic a point of contention to deflect from the fact that they had a possibly dubious interpretation about the visuals of how to represent female dwarves and they knew it would be red meat to right-wing idiots. It was bait. And looking at the legacy of the grifting on about the show, evidently a lot of people bit.You do know that's a lot of modern cinema, right. They bait people into being angry about trivial things because it lowers their need for a marketing budget. You saved them tens of millions of dollars by getting angry about it.Because if you're talking about a trivial thing, they don't need to do as much advertising to let people know it exists.I mean, people like to call people midwits, but what do you call people less than a midwit? That thinks they're smart or clever or in the know, and talk about something because they're falling for a barely concealed trick.Look at the Oddessy, there's probably 1000 hours of video on youtube about a black woman that's in the movie for like, less than five minutes. Literal retards that think they're owning the libs. You do know that they knew you'd fall for that right, because you're not smart, and they're betting on it. People giggle at you when you talk, don't they?<a target="_blank" rel="ugc" href="https://vocaroo.com/1dCKgpymuk1M">https://vocaroo.com/1dCKgpymuk1M</a>Back to my devilish tricks.Works well at a strength of 1Previews made with [Malebolgia] Fraud - Ditch 2 'Turbojuicy Fraud Realistic' Custom Checkpoint Merge Anima

Files with SHA256: fd5a4dc8811fc8744bb5d8be6b4082a8a38f95a1764590268b489943d08289e4