<h1 id="krea-2">Krea-2</h1>This is sort of a beta, since im pretty sure i can manage to make something that is a bit better in terms of keeping the face of the subjects untouched at high value. But Krea-2 is completely different compared to Z-image when it comes to Slider LoRAs, so its hard to say where i am in a couple of days. To make this LoRA, i had to babysit 2 separate LoRAs and make changes every 10-20 steps on both. And merge them after training, with a combined 1300 steps or so. So i just dont have the time to try to make a better one now.It can be used without other LoRAs, but its weak alone, and not recommended. Its also usable with the Bypass-LoRA, but this is also not ideal and a bit unstable. I recommend using this with other NSFW-LoRAs or checkpoints. Some of the once i tested is in the Samples.Recommended range is very different for the different combinations, So this is just a general recommended starting point.<h2 id="recommended-range:-4-to-5">Recommended range: -4 to 5</h2><hr /><h1 id="zit">ZIT</h1>v1.1 is v1.0 merged 50/50 with a v2.0 candidate that i didnt think would live up to a v2.0 quality. Pros of v1.1 is that is retains the original face, light and pose better. And therefor it can also be pushed to higher values. I also changed the name of the LoRA to "Breast" instead of "Breasts", both here in civ and the filename.<h2 id="recommended-range:-3.0-to-10.0"> Recommended range: -3.0 to 10.0</h2><hr />All my work is 100% free. The only thing that really matters to me is people leaving a review, good or bad. I will NEVER remove or block anyone for leaving a bad review, so don't be afraid to give me criticism.I'm stating this because when a creator blocks someone for leaving a bad review, that person can no longer see any of the creator's models, essentially muting their critics. This is something I'm highly critical of, and I believe it's a fundamental quality problem on this site.

Files with SHA256: 39d0fdf1f76b557c21ef599a84615de04179a5272f2b6ff2a254dba26e7669cd