Hi, thanks for keeping and eyes on this LoRA, there is a lot of challenged i'm facing in process, so, it gives me quite a lof of unique experience in LoRA training. I want to do regular penis LoRA too, but my time is very limited right now.

@Pseudough yeah, there is not so much good penis LoRAs right now. But i'll need to stop working on my staff until 21 november, need to go to stationary hospital for some exams. But i'll continue to work on my models and LoRAs after that. Thanks for commentary!

Hi! To make it clear, it's not a LoRA only for futanari. You can use horse penis LoRA with male characters as well. LoRA for regular penises will be the same customizable, yeah. But for the start, only basic tags for controls will be available, for example - sizes for both penis and testicles, state for testicles (sagging / resting) and all fluid-related tags. I think i need to start from 500 to 700 art in dataset for this LoRA. But first of all, i need to get home at least.

Hi,

i've tried to generate a lot of characters before 7th version release, and it was working fine with dark-skinned characters (not tanned, sadly, there is almost no art with tanned characters with horse penises), I've tested it a little bit today, and now i can't get dark-skinned characters even with tag (dark skin, dark-skinned female/male) consistently.

The only one way i was able to get them - (dark-skinned female/male:1.4), (very dark skin:1.2) - in positives.
and
(pale skin:1.4) in negatives. But results are unstable still.

And i'm not sure why this happening. There is a lot pictures with dark skin tag in dataset.

Well. I've found a LoRA on CivitAI, that helps with generation of dark-skinned characters (for anime-based models at least):
-> https://civitai.com/models/81176/chocoskin
Tried it for 100 gens with different emphasis values, works very well. Not sure if this would work good with model you're using, but you can try.

I hope this would help. Thanks for pointing out that problem. I'll try to do something with this in the next update.

@KSinclaire There is a problem with tag for light-skinned testicles, and even tag he have not working as intended. It just painting character skin to some colors because of word "skinned", blue or purple, usually. But it should do just light-skinned testicles, as you mentioned. And even if i'll try to add "light-skinned testicles" or just "light testicles" tag, this also would bring something related to lighting because of word "light" in prompt, so, i can't fix it. And right now i'm not able to find any good solution for this.

Adding something absolutely not related to color like "aqweqwe" tag for this color is a bad idea, i want this LoRA to be intuitive for most people.

Also, i've tried not to add tag at all, to make light-skinned testicles basic color, but this attempt was a failure. This color/concept was lost.

I've asked some creators about penis LoRAs, but most of them never did this kind of concept, and even those, who tried to do that, never did anything better that futa veiny LoRA or this horse penis LoRA. So, i need to investigate all problems on my own.

I hope i'll find a solution for that someday. And for other issues with this LoRA as well.

Thanks for replying!

Hi, for SDXL compatibility it needs to be trained for SDXL. All versions of this LoRA were made for SD 1.5 models. Also, right now there is model called "PonyDiffusionXL", that may do a lot of things, and also, horsecocks, so, such LoRAs are unnecessary.

It can't work on XL models because it was trained for SD 1.5 models. All content for both this versions are incompatible. Of course, the same for SD 1.5 / SD 2.0, SD 2.1 / SDXL models in general. There is also small incompatibility between SDXL models and PonyDiffusion-based models.

But i guess i'll not be able to gather 2000 images of horse penises again. So, i'm pretty sure there won't be an SDXL version of this LoRA. Especially knowing that there is already PonyDIffusion model, good at various penises types.